Dreamlog: Archduke Ferdinand Drops In
A fragment.
I am in a city in the near future where a large sustainability conference is running. There are many interesting events but I only remember one. A bar-and-grill with an old stone fireplace is hosting a town hall discussion led and filmed by a young comedian/blogger/activist/talk show host in the Jon Stewart or Baron Sasha Cohen vein who goes by the screen name 'Archduke Ferdinand'. The event will be produced as a TV or online show called 'Archduke Ferdinand Drops In'.
The resonances of the name are obvious to me in the dream: echoes of the band Franz Ferdinand (which is also named after the archduke) and the political sense that the world is sleepwalking into a crisis worse than World War I, also with an edge of revolution. I feel hopeful, since it seems that this generation is catching a glimpse of their power to change things. This is not entertainment as usual; it has an edge.
Dreamlog: Season 3
Another dream.
A moderately successful science-fiction television show, somewhat like Sliders or Farscape, is now into its third season. The characters are a party who travel by foot or hitchhiking across a fictionalised America getting involved in SF-ish events; alternate universes or an ongoing conspiracy. As conceived they were fairly stereotypical: one was the party Visionary, another the Warrior, and so on. However the two lead actors, including the Visionary (a teenage scientist type who usually produced each episode's McGuffin) have now left the show, leaving the secondary characters to carry the burden of the story.
This is why I am interested in the show: the backstage drama of 'can these somewhat unprepared TV actors carry off the transition to a new format'? Season 3 will be the crucible; either the show will take wings or it will sink, and the ratings, already mediocre, are not looking good.
The cast are having a party, and I am watching as the actress who is now the new lead (having been a sidekick type previously) plays the piano. She wears a vivid blue dress and has flaming orange-red hair and plays with such passion that I can't help feeling deeply sympathetic for her. The scripts she is given are B-movie quality and she's somewhat 'indie' but she pours her whole soul into the interpretation. If anyone can pull this off, she can; but it's by no means a sure thing. It's make or break time and it's entirely possible that the best she has to give will not be enough.
Dreamlog: The Mine
A strange little dream.
I am investigating a secret military compound. It is some kind of mine or workshop built into the side of a hill. Myself and several others are watching the site from trees slightly above it, with cameras. Men in forklifts and earthmovers are around. Suddenly there is a commotion of some kind and people start running out. It takes me a few seconds to work out what is going on; then there is an eruption of debris and it seems that the mine has collapsed. Something has gone horribly wrong.
We are discovered by the commanding officer but he is shaken by the event and has switched allegiances. He was not told of the danger to his men. Now he wants us to assist him in uncovering the story of what happened.
We dig our way into the facility again, and the main question on my mind is: why underground? There doesn't seem to be any actual mining activity going on after all; it's just a kind of garage.
Dreamlog: Cemetery, Blue Cars
After a long while without memorable dreams - and commenting on that last night - I get one this morning.
I am watching an episode of The Simpsons which is apparently set in one school year. It starts in January and ends in August; September-December seem to be the holidays. There are two subplots: Bart starts a cult which ends up becoming a legitimate religious movement. Lisa has to analyse and write a science paper about a perpetual-motion rubber ball which bounces back with more energy than it is thrown with. Wackiness ensues.
By the end of the dream/episode, however, the tone has changed from comedic to serious and the imagery from cartoon to live-action. Bart's presentation has turned into Powerpoint slides containing quotes from A Course In Miracles about the afterlife. I am editing them. Some of the sentences are paraphrases in my own words.
A final shot. The camera pans down from the school grounds to a sunlit cemetery, built into the side of a bank which slopes down to a river. It is a warm summer day. The headstones are rich with moss and many have stone angels. A sense of peace and security. It's a very vivid image and doesn't seem really to fit with the rest of the dream at all.
I wake up with an old hymn playing in my mind, that I've never thought of for years:
Up from the grave he arose
With a mighty triumph o'er his foes
He arose a victor from the dark domain
And he lives forever with his saints to reign
He arose, he arose
Hallelujah, Christ arose
Ok what was *that* about?
Today was Mothering Sunday in the Anglican calendar, and at church in the ancient English tradition, sprigs of rosemary were passed out. I find myself thinking about my parents. Is that connected?
Tonight: not a dream, but a thing that makes one go 'hmm'.
I realise I left my car a couple of blocks away - I forgot and walked home without it, long story. Anyway, it is about 9pm and I need to walk the two blocks down my street.
As I'm walking, as I have often done since I was a kid, I get bored and wish I was already there. I find myself mentally 'jumping ahead', sort of wishing I could teleport, *blip* and be there already. I've never thought much about this; figured it was just imagination. It's not like I or anyone else actually *can* go places just by thinking about it.
Right?
Then I wonder: is this maybe the same thing as bi-location or remote viewing? Is it just actually a matter of mentally presencing yourself in another place? Because I do *that* all the time. And the walking-down-the-street-wishing-I-were-already-there thing is very strong, always has been. Except I've always thought it kind of pointless since I never pick up any actual details; I'm just inhabiting a mental virtual reality, a made-up little inner world.
But I think: okay, so what *if* there's something real? What if in some strange way, by thinking about being down the other end of the street, I might actually in some way be there? If I looked around, what details might I notice that I could later check and confirm?
So I try it. Can I see my car? What do I see?
My mind forms an image: a blue car. It doesn't go away. I don't pick out anything else. I don't see my car. I know the far end of the street is dark. All I 'see' in my mind is a blue car.
This of course is very silly since my real car is red.
So I figure, okay, it's just imaginary. But what would it mean if I do get there and see a blue car?
I get to the dark end of the street. Right in front of me on the footpath - halfway down a driveway so that I have to walk right around it, it's blocking my path - is a car. It's a dark colour. I can't see its colour because there's no streetlight.
A passing car's headlights glint off it and it could be blue, it could be green. I'm getting goose bumps.
I walk right past up close and the car looks black.
I get down the end to my red car, open it up, get inside. I drive past that car, shine the headlights on it, and sure enough - it's dark blue.
Okay. There were maybe a dozen cars on that end of the street. Odds for a blue one are... what? But what are the odds that the blue one would be the one I have to literally squeeze past? Interesting enough to call it a 'hit', I think.
Now the thing is the car I 'saw' in my mind's eye was on the other side of the street, it was a lighter shade of blue, and I 'saw' no other cars. So it's not like I was 'seeing' an actual image. It's more like I was picking up on one feature - if in fact that's what was happening at all, not blind chance, but I think the odds of blind chance are low - and my mind was interpreting the rest. If this is an actual talent, is it remote viewing or precognition, or is there even a difference? If precognition, how does the emotional feedback of the experience itself shape what we see?
The Epworth Phenomena
Okay, here's one thing to investigate. The Epworth Phenomena by Dudley Wright.
This is the 1917 book I found digging through references to John Wesley's journals, about Wesley's documentation of various psychic phenomena, including the haunting of his childhood home. Wesley seems to lie somewhere at the core of this space, at the intersection between spiritualism, German Mysticism and the Evangelical Church.
I do not understand this, and am hardly prepared to say that I believe it; though in any ordinary matter I should accept the word of these two men without hesitation. But, as John Wesley says, "What is it which I do comprehend, even of the things which I see daily? Truly not
"'The smallest grain of sand nor spire of grass,"'
and incomprehensibility therefore is no logical ground for disbelief. Psychologically, it is; for we must know the modus, or, in other words, must link up the new facts with others already accepted. And this is now coming about, through the work of many investigators. Myers said that in Consequence, of the corroborations of psychical research, everyone a century hence will believe in the Resurrection of Christ; whereas, without those corroborations, a century hence no one would have believed it. It may be that something of the sort way be true with regard to many now only half-believed historical narratives of the kind presented in this volume.
God Stories
Well, I'm back.
Where do I go from here? I'm not sure. For the moment, this is the website of a book I'm reading: http://godstories.com/